Linux Security

• 14 June 2014
• by: linuxadmin
• in: Uncategorized
• Tags: Chkrootkit, Ethereal, IPCOP, Iptables, Kismet, Nagious, Nessus, Nmap, Ntop, Our Portfolio, PAM, SE Linux, Shorewall, Social Media, TCP wrapper, Web Designs, Web Tutorials, Wireshark
• note: no comments

Linux Security

Linux Security Modules (LSM) is a framework that allows the Linux kernel to support a variety of computer security models while avoiding favoritism toward any single security implementation. The framework is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License and is standard part of the Linux kernel since Linux 2.6. AppArmor, SELinux, Smackand TOMOYO Linux are the currently accepted modules in the official kernel.

Design

LSM was designed to provide the specific needs of everything needed to successfully implement a mandatory access control module, while imposing the fewest possible changes to the Linux kernel. LSM avoids the approach of system call interposition as used in Systrace because it does not scale to multiprocessor kernels and is subject to TOCTTOU(race) attacks. Instead, LSM inserts “hooks” (upcalls to the module) at every point in the kernel where a user-level system call is about to result in access to an important internal kernel object such as inodes and task control blocks.

The project is narrowly scoped to solve the problem of access control to avoid imposing a large and complex change patch on the mainstream kernel. It is not intended as a general “hook” or “upcall” mechanism, nor does it support Operating system-level virtualization.

LSM’s access control goal is very closely related to the problem of system auditing, but is subtly different. Auditing requires that every attempt at access be recorded. LSM cannot deliver that, because it would require a great many more hooks, so as to detect cases where the kernel “short circuits” failing system calls and returns an error code before getting near significant objects.

The LSM design is described in the paper Linux Security Modules: General Security Support for the Linux Kernel presented at USENIX Security 2002. At the same conference was the paper Using CQUAL for Static Analysis of Authorization Hook Placement which studied automatic static analysis of the kernel code to verify that all of the necessary hooks have actually been inserted into the Linux kernel.

IT Monteur providing word class Linux Security Solution in Delhi India.

Clam Antivirus
Spam Assassin
Snort
Tripwire
Wireshark
Nessus
Nagious
Ntop
Nmap
Chkrootkit
Ethereal
Kismet
Iptables
Shorewall
IPCOP
SE Linux
PAM
TCP wrapper